Back when I was in college, there was a trend in the church toward pithy sayings that sounded deeper than they really were.
The big daddy of these was “What would Jesus do?” or “WWJD?” It works like this. Post a question with serious moral overtones, like “Should we deport law-abiding people who entered the country without documentation?” or “Is it all right to vote for a vulgar, adulterous conman with no integrity?” Now ask, “What would Jesus do?” and follow accordingly.
Unfortunately, there are limits. “My girlfriend is pregnant!” one might share with a confidant. “What should I do?”
“Well, what would Jesus do?” comes the helpful rejoinder.
Not get her pregnant in the first place, would come the answer. Not much help there.
Other people tried to overapply it on the grounds that every area of life should be surrendered to God. (Waffles or an omelette — which would Jesus order?) Given the earnestness with which such questions were asked, they soon became incredibly fraught ethical and spiritual quandaries and led to people no longer inviting Ted to join them for breakfast.
As bad as those were, I remember one particularly bad time to ask the question. It was on a trip to LaSource, Lagonav, and it involved a disabled man who had withered legs and could not walk.
What would Jesus do? I leave it to the reader to ask that question, determine the answer and then guess how things went from there.
Copyright © 2018 by David Learn. Used with permission.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment